The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association seeks that the CJI permit the use of mobile phones to attend virtual hearings

According to the representations; the COVID-19 outbreak seems to have had a significant financial impact on the preponderance of the attorneys;and many lawyers have lost their routine employment.

Having followed this same Supreme Court’s January 17 intimation instructing prosecutors and in-person appellants to attend virtual hearings. Before it via laptop/desktop, the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) might have urged;that Chief Justice of India NV Ramana steer the Registry never to fixate on even a specific type of equipment as well as internet access to attend court proceedings.

Tuesday, January 18, Joseph Aristotle S, Secretary of SCAORA, submitted a notification toward this purpose, explaining that, notwithstanding such disclosures;The SCAORA addressed previously toward the registry’s publication of certain letter.

Through beam of this letter; SCAORA already attracted the CJI’s awareness to this that one has obtained hundreds of requests from delegates of the Bar indicating that perhaps the COVID-19 disease outbreak has strongly affected a large percentage of both the litigators financially. Many lawyers already managed to lose their own routine practice and have also been asked to retreat to their native lands to prevent the expenditure of their workplaces and residential areas.

Additionally, its depiction noted that too many practitioners who already departed to their respective home cities even during holiday break; still has yet to resume attributable toward the rapid increase in COVID-19 instances.

With their submission, the organisation additionally indicated that; perhaps the majority of its people, especially the younger delegates of the Law, utilise cellphones owing to their affordability and indeed the notion that connections is indeed not depended on other aspects such as Wi – fi connectivity, electricity bill, and so forth.

“In fact, for some lawyers, mobile is used as a last resort whereas for some it is the only resource. Advocates who join via a desktop/laptop, with wired connectivity also use mobiles to join the VC hearings.

As per submission, there have also been occurrences of malfunctions with in highest court’s internet that would need attention.

“Hence the registry may not insist on a particular kind of equipment or connectivity to join the court hearings through VC. The Bar and Bench being two wheels of justice have always come together to ensure uninterrupted access to justice for all,” The Prosecutors Office sought the Supreme Court would intercede.

On Friday, January 17th, the Judge Granted instructions to prevent disruptions in litigation process & hardship here to the justices, urging practitioners sitting above it to partake in virtual trials through personal computer with a steady broadband service access, instead the cellular phones.

Previously toward the execution of all this letter, upon January 17; this same Panel led by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana indicated strong unhappiness regarding attorneys presenting before digital proceedings using cellular telephones.

This same topmost court determined about 10 arguments may deferred for a day when (on January 17); since this justices just can not listen and then see the petitioners whom presented from personal cellular telephones. The Court of Hima Kohli,observed that such courts might not have enough endurance to deal with cases throughout this capacity.

Through one similar incident, the Bench asserted,

“Lawyers are appearing from their mobile phones and are not visible. We may have to ban this mobile business…Mr counsel, you are now practicing in the Supreme Court and appear regularly. Can’t you afford to have a desktop to argue?”

Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required.

This field is required.


The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.