The Delhi High Court in the case of [Sanjay Pandey v Directorate of Enforcement] Wherein, Justice Jasmeet Singh held that phone calls cannot be recorded without the consent of an individual under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, and guaranteed the demand of right to privacy. In the case of [KS Puttaswamy v Union Of
The Calcutta High Court in the case of [Asit Kumar Palit vs State of West Bengal] wherein, Justice Rajasekhar Mantha held that the old parents were not feeling comfortable to live with their son and daughter-in-law and lodged an FIR (First Information Report) against them at local Police Station, under the provision of Indian Penal
The Delhi High Court has declared ITC Limited’s ‘Bukhara’ as a well known trademark under Section 2(zg) read with Section 11(2) of the Trade Marks Act and directed the Registrar to add it to the list of well-known trademarks upon completion of requisite formalities. Justice Prathiba M. Singh in the judgment said that certain trademarks
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud on Saturday said that the Indian Constitution does not force its citizens to choose between rights or culture. The CJI was speaking at the Constitution Day event held at the Supreme Court. During his speech, he said that the Constitution includes social, cultural and religious aspects in its goal to achieve
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud (CJI) on Friday said that no institution is hundred percent perfect in a Constitutional democracy and the Collegium system which is followed for appointing judges, cannot be singled out. The CJI in his speech said that merely reforming Collegium system or increasing the salary of judges will not ensure
The Delhi High Court on Friday granted bail to Yes Bank founder Rana Kapoor in a money laundering case being probed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Kapoor was arrested for allegedly sanctioning a loan of over ₹200 crore to a company owned by HDIL promoters Rakesh and Sarang Wadhawan, when he was Chairman of Yes
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, We are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. This website is no mode of advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us to solicit any work from any individual or any other entity. This website has been created with a view to enabling the users to gain more information about our organization for the enhancement of their own knowledge and use. The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt, or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship of any sort. The information provided on this website is solely for informational/educational & demonstration purposes and the same should not be interpreted as an exercise soliciting any kind of work, neither the same be construed as an advertisement exercise.
We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided on this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
The entire material content published on this website is the intellectual property of the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates. Any unauthorized reproduction of the content of this website may entail appropriate legal action as per the relevant statute.
The Team, Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates.
