The Andhra Pradesh High Court’s single-judge bench of Justice Ravi Cheemalapati has reaffirmed that the absence of a consensual connection cannot be a justification for filing a FIR for the crime of rape under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code (“IPC”). The petitioner requested a standard bail after being charged with crimes punishable by
The High Court overturned judgments acquitting the husband and his family members, stating that the evidence of the deceased woman’s parents was rejected on inadequate grounds. The Bombay High Court in Aurangabad recently stated that the societal scourge of dowry persists in our culture, with even ostensibly wealthy people demanding payment from the destitute parents
The Supreme Court considered ways to expand the benefit of Section 3(2)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, to unmarried women so they can also seek medical termination of pregnancy when the period exceeds 20 weeks but does not exceed 24 weeks on Friday in response to a plea from a 25-year-old unmarried
The Kerala High Court ruled on Tuesday that a person need not also be found guilty of aiding his wife’s suicide under Section 306 of the IPC only because they were found guilty of cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC. As highlighted by Justice A. Badharudeen, Sections 498A (cruelty) and 306 IPC (abetment to
The petitioner argued that even someone who is being prosecuted has a right to the dignity and privacy that are protected by Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Indian Constitution. Until the end of his trial in the case, a rape suspect has petitioned the Kerala High Court for orders to maintain and protect
Kappan’s appeal against a Mathura court judgement refusing him bail was denied by single-judge Justice Krishan Pahal. [Sidhique Kappan v State Of UP] The Allahabad High Court denied the bail application of journalist Siddique Kappan, who was charged under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) Kappan’s appeal against a Sessions Court judgement refusing him bail
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, We are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. This website is no mode of advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us to solicit any work from any individual or any other entity. This website has been created with a view to enabling the users to gain more information about our organization for the enhancement of their own knowledge and use. The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt, or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship of any sort. The information provided on this website is solely for informational/educational & demonstration purposes and the same should not be interpreted as an exercise soliciting any kind of work, neither the same be construed as an advertisement exercise.
We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided on this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
The entire material content published on this website is the intellectual property of the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates. Any unauthorized reproduction of the content of this website may entail appropriate legal action as per the relevant statute.
The Team, Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates.
