The Delhi High Court in the case of [Sanjay Pandey v Directorate of Enforcement] Wherein, Justice Jasmeet Singh held that phone calls cannot be recorded without the consent of an individual under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, and guaranteed the demand of right to privacy. In the case of [KS Puttaswamy v Union Of
Bewailing the casteism still prevailing in the country, the Madras High Court noted that even after 75 years of Independence, the government still has to provide separate burial grounds on communal lines. Justice R Subramanian and Justice K Kumaresh Babu observed that the government should ensure that at least the burial grounds should be made
Why the Supreme Court Collegium under CJI DY Chandrachud will have six judges instead of five till May 2023 The Collegium’s strength has been raised to six to make space for CJI Chandrachud’s successor Justice Sanjiv Khanna, who is not currently one of four seniormost puisne judges of the Supreme Court. The Collegium under Chief
The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday observed that it has faced certain difficulties while considering the applicability of Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences, 2012 (POCSO) Act in cases where girls slightly below 18 years enters into physical intimacy with another adult. The petition was filed in opposition to a Madras High Court ruling
INTRODUCTION The term Negligence is derived from the Latin word negligentia, which means ‘failing to pick up’. Generally, negligence means the act of being heedless (careless). We are very much aware of the fact that the majority of things are based on English Law. Hence, the term Negligence as well. The law relating to negligence
Even a Trespasser Could Obtain Injunction If The Possession Is Established: SC The Supreme Court had upheld a decision made by The Madras High Court judgment regarding the decreeing an injunction suit over an established possession of a property by a trespasser. The Bench comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy, and MR Shah stated that “The
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, We are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. This website is no mode of advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us to solicit any work from any individual or any other entity. This website has been created with a view to enabling the users to gain more information about our organization for the enhancement of their own knowledge and use. The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt, or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship of any sort. The information provided on this website is solely for informational/educational & demonstration purposes and the same should not be interpreted as an exercise soliciting any kind of work, neither the same be construed as an advertisement exercise.
We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided on this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
The entire material content published on this website is the intellectual property of the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates. Any unauthorized reproduction of the content of this website may entail appropriate legal action as per the relevant statute.
The Team, Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates.
