The Supreme Court reserved its decision on Wednesday to issue guidelines on how and when mitigating circumstances should be considered during a death penalty trial. Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat, and Sudhanshu Dhulia stated that they would either refer the issue to a larger Bench or frame the guidelines themselves, which could overturn
Delhi High Court on Friday ordered YouTuber Gaurav Taneja (Flying Beast) to delete his tweets in which he had identified, tagged, or hash-tagged Mint writer Shephali Bhatt. Taneja was also ordered by single-judge Justice Amit Bansal to stop referring to her by name in any upcoming tweets and to turn off the comment and retweet
The Supreme Court considered ways to expand the benefit of Section 3(2)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, to unmarried women so they can also seek medical termination of pregnancy when the period exceeds 20 weeks but does not exceed 24 weeks on Friday in response to a plea from a 25-year-old unmarried
The Supreme Court noted that all adverse evidence must be presented in the form of questions while an accused is being examined according to Section 313 CrPC in order to provide the accused a chance to present his defence and provide an explanation. “If all the circumstances are bundled together and a single opportunity is
Kappan’s appeal against a Mathura court judgement refusing him bail was denied by single-judge Justice Krishan Pahal. [Sidhique Kappan v State Of UP] The Allahabad High Court denied the bail application of journalist Siddique Kappan, who was charged under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) Kappan’s appeal against a Sessions Court judgement refusing him bail
The Bombay High Court ruled last week that insulting someone with harsh words does not constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). [Tejas Pomraj Parihar vs the State of Maharashtra] The single-judge Justice Bharati Dangre relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Arnab Goswami vs State of Maharashtra to
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, We are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. This website is no mode of advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us to solicit any work from any individual or any other entity. This website has been created with a view to enabling the users to gain more information about our organization for the enhancement of their own knowledge and use. The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt, or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship of any sort. The information provided on this website is solely for informational/educational & demonstration purposes and the same should not be interpreted as an exercise soliciting any kind of work, neither the same be construed as an advertisement exercise.
We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided on this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
The entire material content published on this website is the intellectual property of the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates. Any unauthorized reproduction of the content of this website may entail appropriate legal action as per the relevant statute.
The Team, Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates.
