The Delhi High Court in the case of [Sanjay Pandey v Directorate of Enforcement] Wherein, Justice Jasmeet Singh held that phone calls cannot be recorded without the consent of an individual under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, and guaranteed the demand of right to privacy. In the case of [KS Puttaswamy v Union Of
The Calcutta High Court in the case of [Asit Kumar Palit vs State of West Bengal] wherein, Justice Rajasekhar Mantha held that the old parents were not feeling comfortable to live with their son and daughter-in-law and lodged an FIR (First Information Report) against them at local Police Station, under the provision of Indian Penal
Bewailing the casteism still prevailing in the country, the Madras High Court noted that even after 75 years of Independence, the government still has to provide separate burial grounds on communal lines. Justice R Subramanian and Justice K Kumaresh Babu observed that the government should ensure that at least the burial grounds should be made
The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday activated a test version of an online portal which can be used by public to file applications under the Right to Information Act (RTI Act) in relation to the apex court. The portal can be used by Indian citizens to file RTI application, first appeal and to make
The draft of the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, which was released by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology on November 18 for public comments, has a provision which proposes to amend the Right To Information Act 2005. Clause 30(2) of the draft proposes an amendment to Section 8(j) of the RTI Act, which
The previously held Digital Lok Adalat in August helped States to settle ₹833,513,857, an amount the upcoming event is expected to surpass. The second ever national Digital Lok Adalat, to be held on November 12, is set to handle over one crore cases. As per a press release, so far, over 80 lakh cases, including
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, We are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. This website is no mode of advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us to solicit any work from any individual or any other entity. This website has been created with a view to enabling the users to gain more information about our organization for the enhancement of their own knowledge and use. The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt, or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship of any sort. The information provided on this website is solely for informational/educational & demonstration purposes and the same should not be interpreted as an exercise soliciting any kind of work, neither the same be construed as an advertisement exercise.
We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided on this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
The entire material content published on this website is the intellectual property of the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates. Any unauthorized reproduction of the content of this website may entail appropriate legal action as per the relevant statute.
The Team, Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates.
