The Calcutta High Court in the case of [Asit Kumar Palit vs State of West Bengal] wherein, Justice Rajasekhar Mantha held that the old parents were not feeling comfortable to live with their son and daughter-in-law and lodged an FIR (First Information Report) against them at local Police Station, under the provision of Indian Penal
The Delhi High Court has declared ITC Limited’s ‘Bukhara’ as a well known trademark under Section 2(zg) read with Section 11(2) of the Trade Marks Act and directed the Registrar to add it to the list of well-known trademarks upon completion of requisite formalities. Justice Prathiba M. Singh in the judgment said that certain trademarks
The draft of the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, which was released by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology on November 18 for public comments, has a provision which proposes to amend the Right To Information Act 2005. Clause 30(2) of the draft proposes an amendment to Section 8(j) of the RTI Act, which
Commenting on this step, the Union Minister for Electronics & Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw said that the idea was in furtherance of the Prime Minister’s philosophy of women empowerment. “We have attempted in the philosophy of women’s empowerment that Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji’s government works, we have attempted to use the words she and
The Supreme Court on Friday pulled up a private medical college for compelling a post-graduate student to pay five lakhs in lieu of compulsory service after completing her course. A Single Judge Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in 2020 had held that the appellant college refusing to release the original documents and the
In his speech, the CJI fondly recalled his experiences at the Bar as a young lawyer. Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud said on Monday that he used to drive around a 1966 model Ambassador car during his days as a young lawyer. Interestingly, he also revealed how he put the classic car to
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, We are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. This website is no mode of advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us to solicit any work from any individual or any other entity. This website has been created with a view to enabling the users to gain more information about our organization for the enhancement of their own knowledge and use. The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt, or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship of any sort. The information provided on this website is solely for informational/educational & demonstration purposes and the same should not be interpreted as an exercise soliciting any kind of work, neither the same be construed as an advertisement exercise.
We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided on this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
The entire material content published on this website is the intellectual property of the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates. Any unauthorized reproduction of the content of this website may entail appropriate legal action as per the relevant statute.
The Team, Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates.
