Supreme Court declines to entertain PIL, says issue within the policy domain

The Supreme Court on Friday disposed of a plea seeking menstrual pain leave for female students and working women across India while allowing petitioners to make a representation before the Central government [Shailendra Mani Tripathi v. Union of India].

A Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala said that since there was a policy dimension in the case, the petitioner could file a representation before the Union Ministry of Women & Child Development.

Having regard to the policy dimension in the case, the petitioner may approach the Women and Child Ministry to file a representation,” the CJI said.

However, the Bench agreed with the submission of a caveator law student that if such leave is compelled, it would automatically operate as a disincentive to engage women as employees.


The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.