Deciphering the effective sequestration of DNA bounded bioactive ...


DNA is an abbreviation of Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid.  It is found in the human body as basic genetic material, which could be extracted from the hairs, saliva, semen, blood, bone, and other organs of the human body.

Today there is no specific law that governs the admissibility of forensic technique. However, the courts derive its validity from the various provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Evidence Act, 1872.  DNA consist of 50% of the biological mother’s DNA and 50% of the biological father’s DNA. So DNA is unique and allows for accurate determination of parentage. DNA of every individual is different expect of identical twins.

In 1953 Scientist Francis H.C. Crick and James Watson describes DNA as building block or genetic blueprint of life. DNA analysis was first performed by English Scientist Alec J. Jeffreys in 1985.



DNA is a strong piece of evidence. It is a powerful investigative tool. So, DNA collected from the crime scene can make anyone suspect or can eliminate one from suspicion. It is used under section 157 of the Indian Evidence act, 1872 to corroborate the earlier statement of witnesses. And it is also used under section 159  to refresh the memory of the witness. It is also used to cross-examine the expert witness under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.



In the case of “Kunhiraman Vs Manoj, 1989,  the first maternity dispute arose. The CJM ordered DNA testing. CJM held that as the expert opinion is admissible under section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 the DNA evidence is also a scientific examination. So, the opinion of expert in cellular and molecular biology is admissible just like opinion of chemical analyst or fingerprint expert. Later on, the Kerala High Court upheld this judgment of Subordinate Court.



DNA evidence is admissible in India as it is part of expert opinion under section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. While considering the fastest development of Science the court had held that, nothing is wrong to direct anyone to undergo DNA analysis for arriving at a proper conclusion by the court. And this will not be the infringement of personal liberty of any individual under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.

But there is an exception to the rule. According to section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act,1872, if the parents are residing together at the time of conception of child, DNA testing cannot be used to avoid paternity. And the idea behind this section is to avoid bastardization.   Recently in a Judgment, the apex Court upheld the validity of section 112 despite the DNA testing proves otherwise.



In civil cases, DNA testing is used by the courts to determine paternity. Section 112 of Evidence Act talks about the legitimacy of a child born during the lawful wedlock or within 280 days of the dissolution of marriage if the mother remains unmarried. But the only exception to rebut this presumption is that the husband proves non-access between them. So, there was an issue before the Courts that while dealing with the paternity matter the DNA test could be ordered or not?

In 1993 the Apex Court issued the following guidelines:
  •  The courts in India cannot order the blood test as a matter of course.
  • No order shall be made if an application is made to roving the inquiry.
  • There must be a strong prima facie case that the husband must establish the non-access between the husband and wife to rebut the presumption under section 112 of the Evidence Act.
  • The courts must have carefully examined the results of allowing the DNA testing, whether it will brand a child as a bastard and a mother as unchaste.
  • An individual shall not be compelled to give the blood tests.


Hence the court will not allow DNA testing

  1. If the wife proves the lawful wedlock as mentioned under section 112 of Evidence Act.
  2. And, the wife proves that there was access between husband and wife.

The court will allow DNA testing:

If the husband proves that there was access between the husband and wife,  at the time of conception of child.


Supreme Court’s decision in “Nandlal Wasudev Badwik VS Lata Nandlal Badwik” (2014)

This judgment has changed the presumption under section 112 of the Evidence Act. The court held that section 112 does not create any legal fiction it is only a presumption. When the husband proves non-access by DNA testing, we cannot force him to bear the fatherhood of the child. We are conscious that a child must not be bastardized but, in view of the DNA testing it has been observed, we cannot forestall the consequences. This denying the truth. “ truth must Triumph” is the hallmark of justice.



In criminal cases, DNA tests used to identify the perpetrators of the crime mainly of sexual offenses and homicide. And also used to identify the remains of the victim.

DNA and Self-incrimination

The Constitution Bench held that taking and retention of DNA which are physical evidence faces no constitutional hurdles under Article 20(3).


DNA  has turned out to be the boon to the judicial system, particularly in criminal matters. But, in civil cases, the prevailing societal aspect considered it against human dignity.

Keeping in view the above circumstances, section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, provides the inherent power to the Courts, to act for the sake of justice, truth, and dignity of judicial administration.


  1. by CharlesExcah 4 months ago

    The truth is a person charged of a crime will probably create a half-baked offer, with no services of a reliable attorney. Therefore, in the event that you or a family member happens to be implicated of carrying out a wrongdoing, do not waver to get hold of certainly one of our Orange county criminal defense attorney experts. Our Staff Our firm sole load every ranks with the top rated professional intellects in the community. All of us of authorized workers are extremely proficient in what the law states in addition to red-tape which complicates a range of criminal arrest court cases. Our criminal defense lawyers are true experts. These law firms should never pass personal judgment on a client faced with heinous criminal activities such as for instance murder, rape as well as child molestation. They need to and to the very best of their ability defend a customer who they could personally imagine to be accountable regarding the crime in which they’ve been charged. Once again, they must put aside particular values additionally sentiments and represent a client that is faced with carrying out atrocious behaviors. That is why, becoming a criminal defense legal professional not just normally requires labor but true character to defending every single person’s protection under the law provided beneath the law. Every instance exhibits its very own certain sets of problems despite which region of the court room your client is located. Through all types of law you will find advantages and disadvantages, however with criminal law most appear to simply begin to see the cons. There’s always the likelihood of a unlawful indictment, a mistrial as part of an incredibly important case, or the risks of working with merciless criminal, notably their own income and different criminal sources of large revenues. Many practitioners will agree totally that there is certainly a long selection of drawbacks, additionally adverse comments that go along with the occupation, but most prospering legal representatives be seemingly able to see after dark extreme words and steps, consequently they are in a position to begin to see the good that is released of doing criminal law. The huge verdicts in which moreover prove your clienteles purity to your locality, all of the the cases and clients, in addition to capability to be cross evaluating witnesses in the court room nearly every night, are often thought about. if you’d like to learn about more info on this specific subject examine the martial arts website online: upland personal injury lawyer all-around Moreno Valley California

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required.

This field is required.


The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.