The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday observed that it has faced certain difficulties while considering the applicability of Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences, 2012 (POCSO) Act in cases where girls slightly below 18 years enters into physical intimacy with another adult.

The petition was filed in opposition to a Madras High Court ruling in Maruthupandi v. State, which held that even if a young woman falls in love and has a consensual relationship with her partner, the POCSO Act’s provisions shall be applied to that person.

The Madras High Court affirmed a man’s conviction under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, for indulging in sexual intercourse with a minor who was 17 years and 10 months old. The man filed a plea before the court appealing that decision.

Advocate Rahul Shyam Bhandari, who represented the petitioner boy, said that the couples’ relationship was consensual and that they had been married and living together for more than four years at this point.

Additionally, the petitioner requested the court to take into account POCSO’s application in situations when relationships are consensual. He had cited a number of such instances that resulted in mistreatment and harassment of a couple, notably the boy who was imprisoned despite the girl’s permission.

The attorney went on to say that the punishment in the current instance was similarly stayed by the High Court under the excuse that the youngster was married.

Dr. Joseph Aristotle, the attorney who spoke on behalf of the State Government, claimed that the POCSO Act was intended to safeguard females who had lost their “choice.” He informed the Bench that she had an abortion in the current instance.

The Bench also noted that charges against men are typically brought by parents of children under POCSO as the hearing went on.

Aristotle said that the girl should have the freedom to go before the court if her circumstances warrant it.

The action was subsequently continued by the Court until September 9, when Bhandari was required to present a copy of the marriage license.



The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.