An article on police interrogation typically delves into the various aspects, practices, and legal considerations surrounding the process of questioning individuals suspected of involvement in criminal activities by law enforcement agencies. The subject is multi-faceted, exploring both the methods employed by police officers to extract information and the legal safeguards in place to protect the rights of individuals during this critical phase of criminal investigations.

The introduction to such an article might provide an overview of the significance of police interrogation in the criminal justice system, emphasizing its role in obtaining crucial evidence, including confessions, and its impact on subsequent legal proceedings. It could touch upon the delicate balance between the imperative to solve crimes and the necessity to uphold individuals’ fundamental rights.

Police Interrogation

Police interrogation is the process during which law enforcement officers question a person suspected of involvement in a crime. The primary goal of police interrogation is to gather information, elicit confessions, and build evidence for criminal investigations. However, the methods and procedures for police interrogation are subject to legal regulations and ethical considerations to protect the rights of the individuals being questioned.

In India, laws governing police interrogations and the rights of individuals are primarily derived from constitutional provisions, statutory laws, and judicial decisions. Below are some key legal aspects related to police interrogations in India:

  1. Constitutional Protections:
    • Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution: Protects individuals from being compelled to be a witness against themselves. This provision is similar to the Fifth Amendment in the United States.
  2. Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973:
    • Section 161: Empowers the police to examine witnesses during an investigation.
    • Section 164: Allows a Magistrate to record confessions and statements made to the police under certain circumstances.
  3. Indian Evidence Act, 1872:
    • Section 24: Addresses the admissibility of confessions made to the police.
    • Section 25: Makes confessions to a police officer inadmissible in court.
    • Section 26: Confessions made in police custody may be admissible if made voluntarily
  1. National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) Guidelines:
    • The NHRC has issued guidelines regarding the rights of arrested persons, including the right to be informed of the grounds of arrest, the right to legal counsel, and the right to medical examination.
  2. Judicial Pronouncements:
    • Various Supreme Court judgments, such as Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani (1978) and D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997), have outlined guidelines and safeguards to prevent custodial torture and ensure the protection of the rights of the arrested person.
    • Techniques followed in police interrogation
    • False Confessions: In some cases, interrogators may use deceptive tactics to elicit a confession. However, the use of false promises, threats, or coercion is generally not permissible under the law.
    • It’s crucial to emphasize that Indian law prohibits the use of physical force, torture, or other forms of coercion during interrogations. The right to remain silent and the right to legal counsel are fundamental rights protected under the Indian Constitution. The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and the Indian Evidence Act provide guidelines regarding the admissibility of statements obtained during interrogation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required.

This field is required.


The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.