In the case of the Delhi Riots, Sharjeel Imam was denied bail. Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat issued the order, the same judge who denied bail to Umar Khalid in a similar case.

A bail was denied to former Jawaharlal Nehru University(JNU) student  Sharjeel Imam accused under the Unlawful Activites  (Prevention) Act in connection with the Delhi riots of the 2020 on Monday.


Imam’s bail application  contested by Tanveer Ahmed Mir, who stated that;  the act of conspiracy as alleged by the prosecution did not occur because;  his arrest occurred before the violence.

“Arrests come first, riots follow.” “I repeat, arrest first, riots later,” Mir urged.

Mir wondered if a conspiracy could continue after someone detained, and if; Imam could be charged for something that; happened after he  arrested.

“The arrest of Sharjeel Imam is not for conspiracy, but for seditious comments previous to his detention,” Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad said. As a result, claiming that an arrest is for conspiracy is a misguided argument.”

The prosecutor further stated that; even if a plot  discovered and investigating authorities  able to avoid disturbances, it still be considered a conspiracy.


In a separate case involving Imam’s utterances, the Court had charged him with sedition, inciting hatred between communities, making statements for public damage, and engaging in criminal acts.

His speeches and the act of distributing pamphlets in Delhi and elsewhere  said to have “promoted or attempted to promote, on grounds of religion, a feeling of enmity, hatred, and ill-will between two communities, namely Hindus and Muslims, or act prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between the said two communities and likely to disturb public tranquilly.”

During protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens, these;  remarks given by Imams at Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) and Jamia Milia Islamia in Delhi (NRC)

Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required.

This field is required.


The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.