The Bombay High Court gave employees of Air India and other unions permission to stay in their Kalina staff quarters until the end of Ganesh Chaturthi festivities on September 24.

Three employee unions, the Aviation Industry Employees Guild (AIEG), Air Corporation Employees Union (ACEU), and All India Service Engineers Association (AISEA), challenged eviction notices directing them to leave their quarters at Kalina, but a bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice MS Karnik refused to overturn them.

The employees were permitted by the Bench to leave the area, however not until the festival festivities were complete.

Ganesh Chaturthi is widely and fervently observed in Bombay, hence the staff is granted time off till September 24. They may stay in the quarters at that time. Not after that, though. There won’t be any coercive action taken against individuals who are still living in the residence until September 24,” the Bench ruled.

After receiving instructions on the retention of office space from the Ministry of Civil Aviation in September, Air India’s 1,800 employees who were living in staff housing in suburban Mumbai anticipated being evicted.

The airline requested an assurance from the personnel that they would leave the staff housing within six months of the airline company’s disinvestment.

The labour commissioner was asked to mediate the conflict between the parties after the employee unions declared a strike.

However, the airline business sent eviction warnings to the employees before the conciliation officer could submit a report.

The employees were forced to seek the High Court as a result. According to the guidelines for Air India allotment, the accommodation was supplied till retirement or end of employment, according to the claim.

One of the arguments made was that the airline could not request a flat vacation until the mediation process was complete.

The corporation informed the Court throughout the hearing, which took place over the course of more than a month, that it will not take any coercive action against its employees for failing to vacate the premises by the predetermined time.

The corporation promised that if the workers didn’t leave the property, it would take the necessary legal action in accordance with the Public Premises Act.

Out of the 1,800 employees, 70% willingly completed the undertaking, and after that, about 300 inhabitants left the property, the corporation told the court. Therefore, the problem only affected the other residents.

On the case’s merits, the firm submitted twice.

It argued, first and foremost, that the writ petition could not be upheld because Air India was not a “State” as defined by Article 12 of the Constitution.

The second argument made was that the petitioner-employees were only licensees and had no ownership stake in the property.

The Court was informed that the attempts at conciliation between the parties had failed after long hearings from the parties. The Bench then went on to decide the case on the merits.



The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.