The petition is filed by NGO minority Front contending that the CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act), NPR (National Population Register) and NRC (National Register of Indian Citizen). The petition was filed by Advocate Ejaz Maqbool and drawn by Advocates Akriti Chaubey, Kunwar Aditya Singh, Muhammad Isa M Hakin and Aishwarya Sarkar.  

The petition stated that the CAA is violative of Articles 14, 15, 21, 25 and 51(a) and 51(c) of the Constitution of India. The petitioners have claimed that the act is arbitrary in light of the basic structure of the Constitution. The Act is unethical on the terms of secularism, the thread upon which our Constitution stands.

The petitioner also stated that the Act does not have an intelligible differentia and does not provide a reasonable classification as regards to the object which is stated in the Act. The objective of the Act is to protect minorities facing religious persecution in countries that have Islam as their state religion and were a part of undivided India.    

The petition also asserted that the Act is violative of various international laws and obligations contained in Articles 2, 9, 10 and 26 of the ICCPR, Article 15 of the UDHR and principles of non-refoulement. The principle of non-refoulement prohibits the State from deporting refugees to their home country when there is an imminent threat to their life and personal liberties.

Section 3 of the Citizenship Act gives rise to three scenarios relating to children born on different dates:

Those children born between January 26, 1950, and before July 1, 1987, are entitled to Indian Citizenship without any condition. However:

  • Those children born on or after July 1, 1987, and December 3, 2004, are citizens of India only of either of their parents are citizens of India at the time of their birth.
  • Those children born after July 1, 1987, and before December 3, 2004, but none of their parents are citizens of India have no right of citizenship.
  • Those children born after December 3, 2004, of that couple where one of them is a citizen of India and the other one is not an illegal migrant at the time of the birth of the child. Such children are a citizen by birth.

In light of the above contentions, it has been prayed that CAA and the notification for NPR be declared unconstitutional.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required.

This field is required.


The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.