The intersection of technology and law has revolutionized various facets of the criminal justice system, and evidence gathering stands as one of the most transformed areas. From rudimentary surveillance methods to the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and digital forensics, the role of technology in aiding investigation, collection, preservation, and presentation of evidence has grown significantly. In today’s rapidly digitizing world, the effectiveness of criminal investigation agencies and even civil litigants often depends on their technological competence and access to tools for evidence gathering.

1. The Expanding Role of Digital Evidence

Digital evidence includes any probative information stored or transmitted in digital form. Emails, social media communications, call data records (CDRs), CCTV footage, GPS data, and cloud storage content have become common elements in both criminal and civil litigation. In India, the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (as amended) provide the legal framework for admissibility of such evidence.

For example, Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act recognizes the admissibility of electronic records if a certificate confirming the authenticity of the electronic document is produced. This provision is critical in ensuring the reliability and validity of digital documents as secondary evidence.

2. Surveillance and Monitoring Tools

The traditional use of closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras has expanded to incorporate facial recognition, thermal imaging, and behavior recognition software. Law enforcement agencies across India have increasingly relied on surveillance infrastructure to track movements of suspects, reconstruct crime scenes, or confirm alibis.

The Integrated Criminal Justice System (ICJS) and Crime and Criminal Tracking Network and Systems (CCTNS) are efforts by the Indian government to digitize investigation processes and integrate police, courts, jails, and forensic labs. Such technological integration ensures better tracking of habitual offenders and real-time sharing of information across agencies.

3. Mobile Forensics and Cloud-Based Data

Smartphones are a treasure trove of evidence, storing not just call logs and messages, but also location data, search history, photographs, health stats, and cloud-synced files. Mobile forensics tools like Cellebrite and Oxygen Forensics allow investigators to extract and analyze data from mobile devices while maintaining a strict chain of custody.

Likewise, cloud computing has added layers of complexity and opportunities. Social media interactions, shared documents on Google Drive or Dropbox, and conversations on encrypted apps like WhatsApp or Signal have all been used in evidence gathering. The challenge lies in obtaining such data without violating privacy rights and ensuring compliance with jurisdictional laws on data storage and access.

4. Use of Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Policing

Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly employed for predictive policing and crime pattern analysis. These systems can scan massive datasets to detect trends and forecast potential crimes. For instance, AI can help identify fraud in financial transactions, flagging unusual behavior in real time.

In forensic investigations, AI algorithms are used to match fingerprints, reconstruct faces, and even simulate voice or gait recognition. While these technologies improve the speed and accuracy of evidence analysis, they also raise concerns about bias, reliability, and potential misuse.

5. DNA Technology and Biometric Advancements

DNA analysis has become a cornerstone in criminal investigations. Technological improvements now allow for faster processing, identification from minute biological samples, and use of DNA databases to link serial offenders. The DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill, 2019 in India aims to regulate DNA testing and maintain strict standards on usage and storage of sensitive biological information.

Biometric evidence including fingerprints, iris scans, and facial recognition are also widely accepted in courts today. The Aadhaar system in India, despite privacy concerns, has opened avenues for authentication of identity in criminal and civil disputes.

6. Blockchain and Evidence Integrity

The most recent technological innovation in evidence management is blockchain. This distributed ledger technology ensures that once data is stored, it cannot be tampered with. Blockchain can be used to secure chain-of-custody logs, digital forensic images, and transaction records. By maintaining an immutable trail of actions and evidence exchanges, blockchain enhances the credibility and admissibility of digital evidence in court.

7. Legal and Ethical Challenges

Despite the advancements, the use of technology in evidence gathering raises several legal and ethical questions:

  • Right to Privacy: The Supreme Court of India in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental right. The use of surveillance and intrusive data gathering must be balanced against this right.
  • Admissibility and Authenticity: Courts often grapple with verifying the authenticity of digital evidence, particularly in the absence of Section 65B certificates or when evidence is collected in violation of procedure.
  • Jurisdiction and Cross-border Data: Many digital platforms store data in foreign jurisdictions, making it difficult for Indian law enforcement to access crucial evidence. Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) and data sharing agreements play a critical role here.
  • Manipulation and Deepfakes: As technology enables creation of hyper-realistic fake videos and audio (deepfakes), the line between real and fabricated evidence becomes blurry, necessitating the development of forensic tools to verify authenticity.

8. The Future Ahead

The continued evolution of technology will further transform how evidence is gathered, analyzed, and presented in courtrooms. Real-time crime mapping, virtual reality crime scene recreation, and AI-powered cross-examination tools are on the horizon. Simultaneously, legal frameworks must evolve to accommodate these innovations while safeguarding individual liberties and ensuring fair trial rights.

Courts must also be equipped with technical infrastructure and trained personnel to deal with tech-heavy cases. Judicial officers, prosecutors, and defense counsel need continuous training in cyber laws, digital forensics, and tech ethics to navigate this terrain confidently.

Conclusion

The use of technology in evidence gathering has unquestionably enhanced the capabilities of investigators and improved the administration of justice. However, it also demands a cautious and balanced approach to avoid overreach, abuse, or erosion of constitutional rights. As India strides into a future shaped by data and digital footprints, legal systems must ensure that justice remains not only technologically advanced but also fundamentally fair and humane.

Contributed by: Aastha Shrivastav (Intern)