Why Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) Are Not a Ground for Divorce in India: A Cultural and Legal Perspective
Introduction In India, marriage is more than a legal contract; it is a sacred institution deeply embedded in religious, social,…
It is illegal to force children under the age of three to attend pre-school…
Shubhra Hiteshbhai Gupta v. State of Gujarat, 2023 Decided on 11-08-2023... Gujarat High Court: The Division Bench of Sunita Agarwal,…
Liking ‘obscene’ content on social media is no crime, but sharing is.-
Allahabad high court Mohd Imran Kazi vs. State of U.P. and Another APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 31091 of 2023…
One cannot claim that someone has a good reputation just because they are well-educated and devout.
Harvinder Singh @ Bachhu V. The State of Himachal Pradesh, Criminal APPEAL No. 266-267 OF 2015 While overturning the Himachal…
Delhi Transport Corporation v. D.T.C Mazdoor Congress, 1991 AIR 101
In the case of DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION vs. DTC MAZDOOR CONGRESS, a group of employees from the Delhi Transport Corporation…
Strikes and lockout:
Syndicate Bank and Ors v. K. Umesh Nayak, 1995 BackgroundThis appeal has been elevated to the Constitution Bench due to…
Meeting the Requirements: Prospective Parent Eligibility and the Government’s Involvement in Adoption
Introduction: At the Law Offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate and Associates, we are committed to providing comprehensive legal support…
Debt Recovery Under MSME Act,2006
Introduction The Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 is an Indian legislation that provides support and protection…
UNDERSTANDING THE GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT, 1890: SAFEGUARDING THE INTERESTS OF MINOR CHILDREN
Background: The ‘Guardian and Wards Act, 1890’ is an Indian legislation that deals with matters related to guardianship and custody…
WITHOUT CONSENT OF AN INDIVIDUAL TAPPING PHONE LINES, RECORDING CALLS IS BREACH OF PRIVACY : STATED ON BAIL ORDER OF SANJAY PANDEY IN DELHI HIGH COURT
The Delhi High Court in the case of [Sanjay Pandey v Directorate of Enforcement] Wherein, Justice Jasmeet Singh held that…