The Supreme Court last week refused to entertain Amnesty International India’s petition challenging the Enforcement Directorate’s attachment of its bank accounts, in view of the fact that the PMLA Adjudicating Authority passed a provisional attachment order on October 7, 2022.

Reserving the right of Amnesty to challenge the provisional attachment order, the Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition.

“We, however, reserve the rights of the petitioner to challenge the aforestated order dated 07.10.2022 in accordance with law and dismissal of this Special Leave Petition shall not be taken to be a reflection on merits or demerits of rival contentions”, the bench led by Chief Justice of India stated in the order.

As per the order dated 07.10.2022 of the Adjudicating Authority, three bank accounts of the Organization having balance of Rs.1,54,03,992.30/- (Rupees One Crore Fifty-Four Lakhs Three Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety-Two Only) along with accrued interest was provisionally attached in terms of Section 5(1) of the PMLA. The order prohibited the transfer, removal or disposal of the amounts attached. This order of attachment will be effective for a period of 180 days and its further continuation will be subject to the confirmation order passed by the Authority.

The special leave petition was filed by the India wing of the international human rights organization against the orders of the Karnataka High Court.

A single bench of the High Court, on December 16, 2020, had given partial relief to Amnesty India by allowing them to withdraw Rupees 60 lakhs to meet the expenses. Aggrieved with the refusal of the single bench to go into the substantive points of challenge raised against the attachment order,Amnesty approached the division bench. On April 8, 2021, the division bench disposed of the appeal observing that the grounds of challenge against the provisional attachment order are to be raised before the PMLA Adjudicating Authority.

Amnesty India had stopped its operations in India following the attachment of its bank accounts.

CASE TITLE: M/s Indians for Amnesty International Trust versus Union of India and others, SLP(Crl) 2541/2022.

For read more click here.

f

Disclaimer

The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.