11 June 2022

Man moves Delhi court claiming all land between Ganga and Yamuna from Agra to Gurugram [Qutub Minar case]

The case before a city court seeking restoration of Hindu Associate in Nursingd faith temples at the; Qutub Minar advanced within the metropolis took a remarkable activate weekday once a contemporary plea filed by one Kunwar Mahender Dhawaj Prasad Singh claiming that; not solely Qutub Minar and Quwwat-ul-Islam musjid, however, the whole space between rivers Ganga and Yamuna from metropolis to Gurgaon (Gurugram) belongs to him. The plea filed as an application in the unfinished suit before a further district’s choose; the Saket court condemned appeals by a bunch of individuals seeking prayer rights within Qutub advanced.

The suit listed for judgment nowadays however since; Prasad move his application, the judgment; is delayed, and therefore the application is detected; before the Court decides the matter.

 The archeologic Survey of the Republic of India (ASI) moreover because the; appellants opposed the application, but choose Dinesh Kumar asked them to file their response. the application by Singh expressed that;  the case concerning prayer rights for Hindus and Jains inside the; Qutub Minar complex can not be determined while;  not hearing him as a result of the land on that; the Minar complex rests has belonged to his family since Mughal times.

In his application, Singh has claimed that; he comes from the Beswan family and traces his lineage to Raja Nand Ram of Uttar Pradesh’s Aligarh district. They submitted to emperor Aurangzeb when; he became firmly established on the throne and therefore, awarded Zamindari rights, the application stated.

These lands continued to be familial by his family through Sanads (charter/patent or deed) issued by the; Mughals and later British. the application argued that; whilst the country gained independence and efforts created to; unite varied princely states, no accession or contract came to be signed between; “Beswan Avibhajya Rajya of Beswan family”. To date, no compensation paid to the family or any acquisition fabricated from these lands thus; it continues to be a princely state, the applying aforementioned. the application said that; the properties continued to belong to Raja Rohini Raman Dhawaj Prasad Singh till his death in 1950 and at that; time it absolutely equally divided between his four sons. 3 of them died since; then solely the individual currently survives, it  submitted.

Read more blogs and news@advocatetanwar.com

Disclaimer

The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.