A religious organisation of the Sunni Muslim scholars and clerics in Kerala Samastha Kerala Jamiathul Ulema has filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the Constitutional validity of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 [https://mk0barandbenchgqge2s.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Muslim-Women-Protection-of-Rights-on-Marriage-Act-2019.pdf] which criminalizes the Tripe Talaq.

The petitioner has contended that punishing Muslim man for pronouncing “Talaq Talaq Talaq” is violative of Article 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution. The concept of Triple Talaq is based on Muslim’s religious identity.

Violations of Article 14

As per Section 3 of the above-mentioned Act, any pronouncement of talaq by a Muslim husband upon his wife, by words, either spoken or written or in electronic form or in any other manner whatsoever, shall be void and illegal.

And as per Section 4, any Muslim husband who pronounces triple talaq will be punished with the imprisonment of 3 years which shall also be liable to fine.

Moreover, after Shahyara Bano, the said utterance is without legal sanction or effect. The marriage survives, regardless of such utterance. Hence, the petitioner has questioned the logic and intent of why the mere utterance of meaningless words should attract a three-year sentence for the husband.

Violations of Article 15

Article 15 of the Indian Constitution prohibits description on the basis of many factors and one such factor is of religion.

If the “triple talaq” has no longer a legal effect than there is no point if these words are uttered only by a Muslim husband or by a husband of any other community. But Sections 3 and 4 has specifically mentioned that the triple talaq uttered by Muslim husband will be declared as void and illegal.

Violation of Article 21

Substantive due process is now recognized to be a part of a person’s fundamental right under Article 21. A law that is not just, fair or reasonable is no law under the Constitution.

There is no welfare approach in this Act as protection of wives can’t be achieved by providing imprisonment to their husbands.

The Act is such an endeavour and ought to be struck down for violating Article 21, the petitioner has contended.

A petition challenging the same law has also been filed in the Delhi High Court.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required.

This field is required.

Disclaimer

The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.