A civil suit is the inaction of one party, called a defendant, who causes the wrongful act to another, called a plaintiff. Harm is compensated by giving some kind of compensation to the aggrieved party. What differentiates the civil suit with that of the criminal complaint is that a civil suit is to compensate for the harm caused to the aggrieved, unlike the latter which emphasizes punishment for the wrongdoer. There are three stages of every civil suit:

  1. Institution of a suit,
  2. Adjudication of a suit and
  3. Implementation of a suit.

The orders passed by the Court are executed at the stage of the implementation of a suit. The execution can be done by the Court where the decree was passed or by any other Court to which the decree is sent for execution. Section 51 of the Code of Civil Procedure describes various ways in which a decree can be executed. They are:

(a) By delivery of any property specifically decreed;

(b) By attachment and sale or by the sale without attachment of any property;

(c) By arrest and detention in prison for such period not exceeding the period;

(d) In such a manner as the nature of the relief granted may require.

In a proceeding for the arrest of Judgment Debtor, if the Decree Holder satisfies the Court that the Judgment Debtor has sufficient means to satisfy the decree, the Court cannot refuse to order the arrest, on the ground that there is an alternative remedy of attachment available to the Decree Holder for the realization of the amount mentioned in the award. When the defendant fails to repay the amount to the decree-holder, the Court can pass an order of the attachment of the property of the Judgment Debtor. The order can be passed against both the movable and immovable property. However, not all properties can be attached.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of V. Dharmavenamma vs. C.Subrahmanyam Mandadi held that neither the Court nor the Judgment Debtor has the authority to force or persuade the Decree Holder as to what mode of execution is to be performed.

In the process of attachment, the Court at the request of the decree-holder designates specific property owned by the debtor to be transferred to the creditor or sold for the benefit of the creditor. Sections 60 to 64 and Rules 41-57 of Order 21 of CPC 1908, deals with the matter of attachment of property.

Order XXI Rules 55-38 explains the circumstances under which the attachment is determined under the Code. These are:

  1. Where the amount is paid or is satisfied.
  2. Where the decree is reversed or set aside.
  3. Where the Court highlights an objection against the attachment and makes an order for releasing the property.
  4. Where after the attachment the application for execution is dismissed.
  5. Where the judgment holder withdraws the attachment.
  6. Where the decree-holder fails to do what he was required to do under the decree.
  7. Where the suit of the plaintiff is dismissed.
  8. Where the attachment is ordered before the judgment and the defendant furnishes necessary security.
  9. Where there is an agreement or compromise made between the parties.
  10. Where the creditor abandons the attachment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required.

This field is required.

Disclaimer

The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.