The Division Bench of the Delhi Court comprising of Justice DN Patel and Justice Hari Shankar recently confirmed that the prisoners have no right to vote as mentioned in Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People’s Act, 1951. This was held in the case titled – Praveen Chaudhary vs. Election Commission of India.

The petitioner contended that Section 62(5) is violative of the basic structure of the Constitution.

The Petitioner argued that under the provision, there was no valid classification between the persons who are in jail and the persons who are on bail or out of jail.

This type of classification, the Petitioner submitted, was not valid in the eyes of law and was violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The Election Commission, on the other hand, argued that this issue had already been decided by the Supreme Court in Anukul Chandra Pradhan, Advocate Supreme Court vs. Union of India & Ors (1997).

The Election Commission pointed out that the Supreme Court had noted that Article 14 permitted reasonable classification which had a rational nexus with the object of classification.

In the above-mentioned case decided by the Supreme Court, it had opined the object of free and fair elections and maintenance of law and order were the essence of democracy and upheld the validity of Section 62(5) for making a reasonable classification.

In view of the submissions and the Supreme Court’s decision, the Court reiterated that the right to vote is neither a fundamental right nor a constitutional right. After perusing a series of other case laws on the issue, the Court opined that Section 62(5) was constitutionally valid.

The writ petition was accordingly dismissed.

Advocate Sidhant Kumar represented Election Commission.

The Petitioner appeared in person.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required.

This field is required.

Disclaimer

The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.