10 may 2022

“It’s very unfortunate:” The Supreme Court condemns Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi’s abrupt departure from a virtual hearing.

The Supreme Court criticized Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi on Monday for quitting a virtual hearing in the middle.

The behavior of Senior Counsel described as “extremely terrible” by a bench of Justices MR Shah and BV Nagarathna.

Hearings before the Bench proceeding regularly when a junior counsel requested; a pass over in a matter because Rohatgi, who scheduled to attend,  not in court. Rohatgi appeared electronically and gave remarks after Justice Shah refused the request.

After the respondents’ closing arguments, the Bench inquired if Rohatgi, who represented the petitioner, any counter arguments.

The Court, however,  unable to detect; the Senior Advocate on screen, forcing his subordinate to request a pass over.

The Bench, which  about to reserve its decision in the matter, said that; the senior lawyer’s actions were “very regrettable.”

The same recorded in the order, which stated,

“We wished to ask the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner some more questions after; the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents ended their remarks. However, the petitioner’s learned Senior Advocate, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, departed the Court in the middle of arguments while the case  still being heard. This is a terrible situation.”

The Bench also ruled in the decision that he should not have left the hearing while it ongoing.

“Even if he necessary for another Court, he should have obtained the Court’s permission,” the Bench said while deferring the decision.

On Monday, at Court No 3, presided over by Justice AM Khanwilkar, similar circumstances occurred when the court was unable to find Rohatgi in a case involving a challenge to the IT Rules, 2021.

As a result, the Bench concluded that; virtual hearings should not be used for admission hearings and should instead be reserved for final hearings.

“Hybrid hearing does not operate effectively,” said the Bench, which included Justice Abhay S Oka.

Read more blogs and news@advocatetanwar.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required.

This field is required.

Disclaimer

The following disclaimer governs the use of this website (“Website”) and the services provided by the Law offices of Kr. Vivek Tanwar Advocate & Associates in accordance with the laws of India. By accessing or using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions stated in this disclaimer.

The information provided on this Website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or relied upon as such. The content of this Website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Firm. Any reliance on the information provided on this Website is done at your own risk.

The Law Firm makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained on this Website.

The Law Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this Website or for any actions taken in reliance on the information provided herein. The information contained in this website, should not be construed as an act of solicitation of work or advertisement in any manner.